Skip to the sheets
Round SheetWorking notes from the competition desk

ProtocolSheets 8Logged 22/09/2026

Sheet
RE-001
Station
Results
Logged

What One Competition Season Leaves Behind

An archived season holds entry forms, heat lists, programs, marks, results and the corrections filed after each round, in the order the desk received them.

1,169 wordsReading 5 minSources read 1

A folding table at the edge of a ballroom floor, covered with printed heat lists and a stapled program, a clipboard and pen on top, warm overhead light from the ceiling rig, shot from a slight angle with the empty floor behind.
View RE-001 Station Results, logged

A single archived season holds six document families in a fixed order: entry forms, heat lists, programs, marks, results and the corrections that followed. The order is not editorial. It is the order in which the paperwork crossed the desk, and it is the reason a season can be reconstructed years later without a single phone call.

The files an event desk writes down follow that order, and each one is dated by the event it served: the entry form as received, the heat list as scheduled, the program as printed, the marks as signed, the placements as posted, the correction as filed. A season is not a folder of memories. It is a stack of dated files that agree with one another, and the disagreements are the interesting part.

The same discipline appears in fields far from the ballroom floor. Agencies that map risk before acting keep the same paper trail, and the reasoning behind it is set out in the working notes of the prevention atlas, where prediction is treated as a documented decision rather than a hunch. A competition desk and a public agency share one problem: the record must explain the decision to someone who was not in the room.

What does an entry form actually record?

An entry form records four things and one promise. It names the competitor, the event, the partner or team, and the category entered. The promise is the fee, and the fee is what makes the form a contract rather than a wish.

Three versions of the form usually survive. The online form is the first submission, timestamped and often incomplete. The master form is the desk's consolidated list, corrected by hand after the deadline. The printable form is what the competitor carried to the venue, and it is the version that gets argued about at check-in.

When the three disagree, the master form wins, because it is the one the heat list was built from. A season archive that keeps only the printable version loses the correction history, and the correction history is what tells a later reader why a competitor appears in a heat they never entered.

How a heat list turns entries into a running order

A heat list turns a count into a schedule. The desk takes the master entry count per category, divides by the floor capacity of the venue, and assigns heat numbers. A category with 24 couples and a floor that holds 12 produces two heats. A category with 25 produces three, and the third heat is short.

The heat list is the first document that can be wrong in public. A competitor reads their heat number, plans a warm-up, and arrives at the floor at the wrong time if the list changed after printing. Archives that keep every revision of the heat list, with the date of each revision, let a later reader see the change rather than guess at it.

Heats and HeatLists are separate paths for this reason. One is the schedule, the other is the assignment. They are generated from the same source and they diverge the moment a scratch is filed.

What the program adds that the heat list does not

The program adds the order of events, the session breaks, the adjudicator panel and the awards times. It is the document handed to the audience, and it is the only one written for someone who is not competing.

A program is also the document most likely to be printed once and never revised. When a session runs long, the program stays as printed and the desk announces the change aloud. The archive then holds a program that no longer matches the running order, and a note, if the desk kept one, explaining the delay.

For a season archive, the program is the anchor for time. Marks and results are stamped against sessions, and sessions are defined by the program. Without it, a scoresheet is a number without a clock.

Marks, placements and the difference between them

Marks are what the adjudicators wrote. Placements are what the scrutineer calculated from those marks. Results are what the desk published.

The three are not the same document and should never be stored as one. A scoresheet by person holds the marks for every judge across every round that competitor danced. A placement sheet holds the final order per category. A results file holds the published outcome, including ties and any adjusted placement.

A tie is the clearest test of the archive. Two competitors with identical marks produce a placement that depends on the tie-break rule in force that season. If the rule is not in the archive, the placement looks arbitrary to anyone reading it later. One line of documentation prevents that.

Which corrections survive a season?

Corrections survive in three forms: scratches, re-dances and clerical fixes.

A scratch is filed before the heat and removes a competitor from the running order. A re-dance is granted after a floor incident and produces a second set of marks for the same round. A clerical fix corrects a name, a number or a category after publication.

The first two change results. The third does not, and it is the one most often lost. A season archive that keeps scratches and re-dances but discards name corrections will publish a results file that no longer matches the program, the heat list or the competitor's own record.

The rule is simple: if a document was reissued, both versions stay. The date on the reissue is the evidence.

How long should a season archive be kept?

Long enough to answer a dispute, and disputes arrive late. A placement questioned in the week after an event is answered from the results file. A placement questioned two seasons later is answered from the marks, the tie-break rule and the heat list together.

A practical floor is the retention period stated by the sanctioning body for the event, plus one full cycle. Where no period is stated, keeping the six document families for the current season and the two preceding seasons covers nearly every question a desk receives.

Storage cost is not the constraint. The constraint is naming. A file named by event, date and document type can be found in seconds. A file named by competitor alone cannot be found at all once the season closes.

What a season archive is for

A season archive is not a memory. It is a defence, a teaching file and a template for the next season at once. The entry forms show what was promised. The heat lists show what was scheduled. The program shows what was announced. The marks show what was judged. The results show what was published. The corrections show what changed, and when.

A desk that keeps all six can reconstruct any round of any session without contacting a single person. A desk that keeps only the results has a list of names and no way to explain a single number on it.

Neighbouring sheets

A clipboard with a signed judge sheet resting on a folding table beside a roll of tape and a printed placement list, lit by a single overhead lamp in an empty ballroom after the last final.
View RE-002
Sheet
RE-002
Station
Results
Logged

Results on the Wall the Same Night

What must be in place before the last final for placements to reach the wall and the web the same evening: entry counts, judge sheets, tabulation, and a posted

1,050 words · 5 min

A judge's paper scoresheet on a clipboard resting on a wooden table beside a pencil, with columns of handwritten placements and a printed heat list, lit by overhead hall light.
View JU-002
Sheet
JU-002
Station
Judging
Logged

The Skating System: How Marks Become Places

The skating system turns panels of marks into places by majority, one round at a time. A worked example shows the arithmetic from first places to final ranking.

923 words · 4 min